[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140121060428.GA19037@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 22:04:28 -0800
From: Greg Kroah-Hartmann <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] mm, memcg: avoid oom notification when current needs
access to memory reserves
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:58:28PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> The patches getting proposed through -mm for stable boggles my mind
> sometimes.
Do you have any objections to patches that I have taken for -stable? If
so, please let me know.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists