[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DE2208.9040908@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 08:30:16 +0100
From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Ayer <agwa@...rewayer.name>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
CC: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Add fchmodat4 syscall: fchmodat with flag argument
On 01/13/2012 02:53 AM, Andrew Ayer wrote:
> This adds a 4 argument version of fchmodat (fchmodat4) that
> supports a flag argument, as specified by POSIX. It supports
> the same two flags as fchownat: AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW and AT_EMPTY_PATH.
I don't think it's possible to emulate AT_EMPTY_PATH in user space, so I
wonder if this could be applied, and if not, why. Thanks.
--
Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security Team
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists