| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <4b9118cb4cc744bdb2e9c25fa32d6950@BL2PR03MB259.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 07:27:15 +0000
From: "Bharat.Bhushan@...escale.com" <Bharat.Bhushan@...escale.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>
CC: "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
> -----Original Message-----
> From: iommu-bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
> bounces@...ts.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Alex Williamson
> Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2014 2:06 AM
> To: Sethi Varun-B16395
> Cc: iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: [RFC PATCH] vfio/iommu_type1: Multi-IOMMU domain support
>
> RFC: This is not complete but I want to share with Varun the
> dirrection I'm thinking about. In particular, I'm really not
> sure if we want to introduce a "v2" interface version with
> slightly different unmap semantics. QEMU doesn't care about
> the difference, but other users might. Be warned, I'm not even
> sure if this code works at the moment. Thanks,
>
> Alex
>
>
> We currently have a problem that we cannot support advanced features
> of an IOMMU domain (ex. IOMMU_CACHE), because we have no guarantee
> that those features will be supported by all of the hardware units
> involved with the domain over its lifetime. For instance, the Intel
> VT-d architecture does not require that all DRHDs support snoop
> control. If we create a domain based on a device behind a DRHD that
> does support snoop control and enable SNP support via the IOMMU_CACHE
> mapping option, we cannot then add a device behind a DRHD which does
> not support snoop control or we'll get reserved bit faults from the
> SNP bit in the pagetables. To add to the complexity, we can't know
> the properties of a domain until a device is attached.
>
> We could pass this problem off to userspace and require that a
> separate vfio container be used, but we don't know how to handle page
> accounting in that case. How do we know that a page pinned in one
> container is the same page as a different container and avoid double
> billing the user for the page.
>
> The solution is therefore to support multiple IOMMU domains per
> container. In the majority of cases, only one domain will be required
> since hardware is typically consistent within a system. However, this
> provides us the ability to validate compatibility of domains and
> support mixed environments where page table flags can be different
> between domains.
>
> To do this, our DMA tracking needs to change. We currently try to
> coalesce user mappings into as few tracking entries as possible. The
> problem then becomes that we lose granularity of user mappings. We've
> never guaranteed that a user is able to unmap at a finer granularity
> than the original mapping, but we must honor the granularity of the
> original mapping. This coalescing code is therefore removed, allowing
> only unmaps covering complete maps. The change in accounting is
> fairly small here, a typical QEMU VM will start out with roughly a
> dozen entries, so it's arguable if this coalescing was ever needed.
>
> We also move IOMMU domain creation to the point where a group is
> attached to the container. An interesting side-effect of this is that
> we now have access to the device at the time of domain creation and
> can probe the devices within the group to determine the bus_type.
> This finally makes vfio_iommu_type1 completely device/bus agnostic.
> In fact, each IOMMU domain can host devices on different buses managed
> by different physical IOMMUs, and present a single DMA mapping
> interface to the user. When a new domain is created, mappings are
> replayed to bring the IOMMU pagetables up to the state of the current
> container. And of course, DMA mapping and unmapping automatically
> traverse all of the configured IOMMU domains.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 631 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
> include/uapi/linux/vfio.h | 1
> 2 files changed, 329 insertions(+), 303 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> index 4fb7a8f..983aae5 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
> @@ -30,7 +30,6 @@
> #include <linux/iommu.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> -#include <linux/pci.h> /* pci_bus_type */
> #include <linux/rbtree.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -55,11 +54,18 @@ MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_hugepages,
> "Disable VFIO IOMMU support for IOMMU hugepages.");
>
> struct vfio_iommu {
> - struct iommu_domain *domain;
> + struct list_head domain_list;
> struct mutex lock;
> struct rb_root dma_list;
> + bool v2;
> +};
> +
> +struct vfio_domain {
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> + struct bus_type *bus;
> + struct list_head next;
> struct list_head group_list;
> - bool cache;
> + int prot; /* IOMMU_CACHE */
> };
>
> struct vfio_dma {
> @@ -99,7 +105,7 @@ static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma(struct vfio_iommu
> *iommu,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> -static void vfio_insert_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *new)
> +static void vfio_link_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *new)
> {
> struct rb_node **link = &iommu->dma_list.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
> struct vfio_dma *dma;
> @@ -118,7 +124,7 @@ static void vfio_insert_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct
> vfio_dma *new)
> rb_insert_color(&new->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> }
>
> -static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> +static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
> {
> rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
> }
> @@ -322,32 +328,39 @@ static long vfio_unpin_pages(unsigned long pfn, long
> npage,
> return unlocked;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma,
> - dma_addr_t iova, size_t *size)
> +static void vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> {
> - dma_addr_t start = iova, end = iova + *size;
> + dma_addr_t iova = dma->iova, end = dma->iova + dma->size;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> long unlocked = 0;
>
> + if (!dma->size)
> + return;
> + /*
> + * We use the IOMMU to track the physical addresses, otherwise we'd
> + * need a much more complicated tracking system. Unfortunately that
> + * means we need to use one of the iommu domains to figure out the
> + * pfns to unpin. The rest need to be unmapped in advance so we have
> + * no iommu translations remaining when the pages are unpinned.
> + */
> + domain = d = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list,
> + struct vfio_domain, next);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_continue(d, &iommu->domain_list, next)
> + iommu_unmap(d->domain, dma->iova, dma->size);
> +
> while (iova < end) {
> size_t unmapped;
> phys_addr_t phys;
>
> - /*
> - * We use the IOMMU to track the physical address. This
> - * saves us from having a lot more entries in our mapping
> - * tree. The downside is that we don't track the size
> - * used to do the mapping. We request unmap of a single
> - * page, but expect IOMMUs that support large pages to
> - * unmap a larger chunk.
> - */
> - phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu->domain, iova);
> + phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain->domain, iova);
> if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> continue;
> }
>
> - unmapped = iommu_unmap(iommu->domain, iova, PAGE_SIZE);
> - if (!unmapped)
> + unmapped = iommu_unmap(domain->domain, iova, PAGE_SIZE);
> + if (WARN_ON(!unmapped))
> break;
>
> unlocked += vfio_unpin_pages(phys >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> @@ -357,119 +370,26 @@ static int vfio_unmap_unpin(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> struct vfio_dma *dma,
> }
>
> vfio_lock_acct(-unlocked);
> -
> - *size = iova - start;
> -
> - return 0;
> }
>
> -static int vfio_remove_dma_overlap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t start,
> - size_t *size, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> +static void vfio_remove_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *dma)
> {
> - size_t offset, overlap, tmp;
> - struct vfio_dma *split;
> - int ret;
> -
> - if (!*size)
> - return 0;
> -
> - /*
> - * Existing dma region is completely covered, unmap all. This is
> - * the likely case since userspace tends to map and unmap buffers
> - * in one shot rather than multiple mappings within a buffer.
> - */
> - if (likely(start <= dma->iova &&
> - start + *size >= dma->iova + dma->size)) {
> - *size = dma->size;
> - ret = vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, dma->iova, size);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - /*
> - * Did we remove more than we have? Should never happen
> - * since a vfio_dma is contiguous in iova and vaddr.
> - */
> - WARN_ON(*size != dma->size);
> -
> - vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
> - kfree(dma);
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /* Overlap low address of existing range */
> - if (start <= dma->iova) {
> - overlap = start + *size - dma->iova;
> - ret = vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, dma->iova, &overlap);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
> -
> - /*
> - * Check, we may have removed to whole vfio_dma. If not
> - * fixup and re-insert.
> - */
> - if (overlap < dma->size) {
> - dma->iova += overlap;
> - dma->vaddr += overlap;
> - dma->size -= overlap;
> - vfio_insert_dma(iommu, dma);
> - } else
> - kfree(dma);
> -
> - *size = overlap;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /* Overlap high address of existing range */
> - if (start + *size >= dma->iova + dma->size) {
> - offset = start - dma->iova;
> - overlap = dma->size - offset;
> -
> - ret = vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, start, &overlap);
> - if (ret)
> - return ret;
> -
> - dma->size -= overlap;
> - *size = overlap;
> - return 0;
> - }
> -
> - /* Split existing */
> -
> - /*
> - * Allocate our tracking structure early even though it may not
> - * be used. An Allocation failure later loses track of pages and
> - * is more difficult to unwind.
> - */
> - split = kzalloc(sizeof(*split), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!split)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> - offset = start - dma->iova;
> -
> - ret = vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma, start, size);
> - if (ret || !*size) {
> - kfree(split);
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - tmp = dma->size;
> + vfio_unmap_unpin(iommu, dma);
> + vfio_unlink_dma(iommu, dma);
> + kfree(dma);
> +}
>
> - /* Resize the lower vfio_dma in place, before the below insert */
> - dma->size = offset;
> +static unsigned long vfio_pgsize_bitmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct vfio_domain *domain;
> + unsigned long bitmap = PAGE_MASK;
>
> - /* Insert new for remainder, assuming it didn't all get unmapped */
> - if (likely(offset + *size < tmp)) {
> - split->size = tmp - offset - *size;
> - split->iova = dma->iova + offset + *size;
> - split->vaddr = dma->vaddr + offset + *size;
> - split->prot = dma->prot;
> - vfio_insert_dma(iommu, split);
> - } else
> - kfree(split);
> + mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next)
> + bitmap &= domain->domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap;
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - return 0;
> + return bitmap;
> }
>
> static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> @@ -477,10 +397,10 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> {
> uint64_t mask;
> struct vfio_dma *dma;
> - size_t unmapped = 0, size;
> + size_t unmapped = 0;
> int ret = 0;
>
> - mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
> + mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>
> if (unmap->iova & mask)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -491,20 +411,61 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> + /*
> + * vfio-iommu-type1 (v1) - User mappings were coalesced together to
> + * avoid tracking individual mappings. This means that the granularity
> + * of the original mapping was lost and the user was allowed to attempt
> + * to unmap any range. Depending on the contiguousness of physical
> + * memory and page sizes supported by the IOMMU, arbitrary unmaps may
> + * or may not have worked. We only guaranteed unmap granularity
> + * matching the original mapping; even though it was untracked here,
> + * the original mappings are reflected in IOMMU mappings. This
> + * resulted in a couple unusual behaviors. First, if a range is not
> + * able to be unmapped, ex. a set of 4k pages that was mapped as a
> + * 2M hugepage into the IOMMU, the unmap ioctl returns success but with
> + * a zero sized unmap. Also, if an unmap request overlaps the first
> + * address of a hugepage, the IOMMU will unmap the entire hugepage.
> + * This also returns success and the returned unmap size reflects the
> + * actual size unmapped.
> + *
> + * We attempt to maintain compatibility with this interface, but we
> + * take control out of the hands of the IOMMU. An unmap request offset
> + * from the beginning of the original mapping will return success with
> + * zero sized unmap. An unmap request covering the first iova of
> + * mapping will unmap the entire range.
> + *
> + * The v2 version of this interface intends to be more deterministic.
> + * Unmap requests must fully cover previous mappings. Multiple
> + * mappings may still be unmaped by specifying large ranges, but there
> + * must not be any previous mappings bisected by the range. An error
> + * will be returned if these conditions are not met. The v2 interface
> + * will only return success and a size of zero if there were no
> + * mappings within the range.
> + */
> + if (iommu->v2 ) {
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, 0);
> + if (dma && dma->iova != unmap->iova) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova + unmap->size - 1, 0);
> + if (dma && dma->iova + dma->size != unmap->iova + unmap->size) {
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto unlock;
> + }
> + }
> +
> while ((dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, unmap->iova, unmap->size))) {
> - size = unmap->size;
> - ret = vfio_remove_dma_overlap(iommu, unmap->iova, &size, dma);
> - if (ret || !size)
> + if (!iommu->v2 && unmap->iova > dma->iova)
> break;
> - unmapped += size;
> + unmapped += dma->size;
> + vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
> }
>
> +unlock:
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - /*
> - * We may unmap more than requested, update the unmap struct so
> - * userspace can know.
> - */
> + /* Report how much was unmapped */
> unmap->size = unmapped;
>
> return ret;
> @@ -516,22 +477,47 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_unmap(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> * soon, so this is just a temporary workaround to break mappings down into
> * PAGE_SIZE. Better to map smaller pages than nothing.
> */
> -static int map_try_harder(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t iova,
> +static int map_try_harder(struct vfio_domain *domain, dma_addr_t iova,
> unsigned long pfn, long npage, int prot)
> {
> long i;
> int ret;
>
> for (i = 0; i < npage; i++, pfn++, iova += PAGE_SIZE) {
> - ret = iommu_map(iommu->domain, iova,
> + ret = iommu_map(domain->domain, iova,
> (phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> - PAGE_SIZE, prot);
> + PAGE_SIZE, prot | domain->prot);
> if (ret)
> break;
> }
>
> for (; i < npage && i > 0; i--, iova -= PAGE_SIZE)
> - iommu_unmap(iommu->domain, iova, PAGE_SIZE);
> + iommu_unmap(domain->domain, iova, PAGE_SIZE);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, dma_addr_t iova,
> + unsigned long pfn, long npage, int prot)
> +{
> + struct vfio_domain *d;
> + int ret;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + ret = iommu_map(d->domain, iova, (phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> + npage << PAGE_SHIFT, prot | d->prot);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (ret != -EBUSY ||
> + map_try_harder(d, iova, pfn, npage, prot))
> + goto unwind;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +unwind:
> + list_for_each_entry_continue_reverse(d, &iommu->domain_list, next)
> + iommu_unmap(d->domain, iova, npage << PAGE_SHIFT);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -545,12 +531,12 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> long npage;
> int ret = 0, prot = 0;
> uint64_t mask;
> - struct vfio_dma *dma = NULL;
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> unsigned long pfn;
>
> end = map->iova + map->size;
>
> - mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(iommu->domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap)) - 1;
> + mask = ((uint64_t)1 << __ffs(vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu))) - 1;
>
> /* READ/WRITE from device perspective */
> if (map->flags & VFIO_DMA_MAP_FLAG_WRITE)
> @@ -561,9 +547,6 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> if (!prot)
> return -EINVAL; /* No READ/WRITE? */
>
> - if (iommu->cache)
> - prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
> -
> if (vaddr & mask)
> return -EINVAL;
> if (map->iova & mask)
> @@ -588,180 +571,249 @@ static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> return -EEXIST;
> }
>
> - for (iova = map->iova; iova < end; iova += size, vaddr += size) {
> - long i;
> + dma = kzalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!dma) {
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> + dma->iova = map->iova;
> + dma->vaddr = map->vaddr;
> + dma->prot = prot;
> +
> + /* Insert zero-sized and grow as we map chunks of it */
> + vfio_link_dma(iommu, dma);
> +
> + for (iova = map->iova; iova < end; iova += size, vaddr += size) {
> /* Pin a contiguous chunk of memory */
> npage = vfio_pin_pages(vaddr, (end - iova) >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> prot, &pfn);
> if (npage <= 0) {
> WARN_ON(!npage);
> ret = (int)npage;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - /* Verify pages are not already mapped */
> - for (i = 0; i < npage; i++) {
> - if (iommu_iova_to_phys(iommu->domain,
> - iova + (i << PAGE_SHIFT))) {
> - ret = -EBUSY;
> - goto out_unpin;
> - }
> + break;
> }
>
> - ret = iommu_map(iommu->domain, iova,
> - (phys_addr_t)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT,
> - npage << PAGE_SHIFT, prot);
> + /* Map it! */
> + ret = vfio_iommu_map(iommu, iova, pfn, npage, prot);
> if (ret) {
> - if (ret != -EBUSY ||
> - map_try_harder(iommu, iova, pfn, npage, prot)) {
> - goto out_unpin;
> - }
> + vfio_unpin_pages(pfn, npage, prot, true);
> + break;
> }
>
> size = npage << PAGE_SHIFT;
> + dma->size += size;
> + }
>
> - /*
> - * Check if we abut a region below - nothing below 0.
> - * This is the most likely case when mapping chunks of
> - * physically contiguous regions within a virtual address
> - * range. Update the abutting entry in place since iova
> - * doesn't change.
> - */
> - if (likely(iova)) {
> - struct vfio_dma *tmp;
> - tmp = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova - 1, 1);
> - if (tmp && tmp->prot == prot &&
> - tmp->vaddr + tmp->size == vaddr) {
> - tmp->size += size;
> - iova = tmp->iova;
> - size = tmp->size;
> - vaddr = tmp->vaddr;
> - dma = tmp;
> - }
> - }
> + if (ret)
> + vfio_remove_dma(iommu, dma);
>
> - /*
> - * Check if we abut a region above - nothing above ~0 + 1.
> - * If we abut above and below, remove and free. If only
> - * abut above, remove, modify, reinsert.
> - */
> - if (likely(iova + size)) {
> - struct vfio_dma *tmp;
> - tmp = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova + size, 1);
> - if (tmp && tmp->prot == prot &&
> - tmp->vaddr == vaddr + size) {
> - vfio_remove_dma(iommu, tmp);
> - if (dma) {
> - dma->size += tmp->size;
> - kfree(tmp);
> - } else {
> - size += tmp->size;
> - tmp->size = size;
> - tmp->iova = iova;
> - tmp->vaddr = vaddr;
> - vfio_insert_dma(iommu, tmp);
> - dma = tmp;
> - }
> - }
> - }
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_bus_type(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct vfio_domain *domain = data;
> +
> + if (domain->bus && domain->bus != dev->bus)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + domain->bus = dev->bus;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> + struct vfio_domain *domain)
> +{
> + struct vfio_domain *d;
> + struct rb_node *n;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* Arbitrarily pick the first domain in the list for lookups */
> + d = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list, struct vfio_domain, next);
> + n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
> +
> + /* If there's not a domain, there better not be any mappings */
> + if (WARN_ON(n && !d))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
> + struct vfio_dma *dma;
> + dma_addr_t iova;
> +
> + dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
> + iova = dma->iova;
>
> - if (!dma) {
> - dma = kzalloc(sizeof(*dma), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!dma) {
> - iommu_unmap(iommu->domain, iova, size);
> - ret = -ENOMEM;
> - goto out_unpin;
> + while (iova < dma->iova + dma->size) {
> + phys_addr_t phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain, iova);
> + size_t size;
> +
> + if (WARN_ON(!phys)) {
> + iova += PAGE_SIZE;
> + continue;
> }
>
> - dma->size = size;
> - dma->iova = iova;
> - dma->vaddr = vaddr;
> - dma->prot = prot;
> - vfio_insert_dma(iommu, dma);
> - }
> - }
> + size = PAGE_SIZE;
>
> - WARN_ON(ret);
> - mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> - return ret;
> + while (iova + size < dma->iova + dma->size &&
> + phys + size == iommu_iova_to_phys(d->domain,
> + iova + size))
> + size += PAGE_SIZE;
>
> -out_unpin:
> - vfio_unpin_pages(pfn, npage, prot, true);
> + ret = iommu_map(domain->domain, iova, phys,
> + size, dma->prot | domain->prot);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
>
> -out:
> - iova = map->iova;
> - size = map->size;
> - while ((dma = vfio_find_dma(iommu, iova, size))) {
> - int r = vfio_remove_dma_overlap(iommu, iova,
> - &size, dma);
> - if (WARN_ON(r || !size))
> - break;
> + iova += size;
> + }
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> - struct vfio_group *group, *tmp;
> + struct vfio_group *group, *g;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain, *d;
> int ret;
>
> - group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (!group)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> -
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(tmp, &iommu->group_list, next) {
> - if (tmp->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + list_for_each_entry(g, &d->group_list, next) {
> + if (g->iommu_group != iommu_group)
> + continue;
> +
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> - kfree(group);
> return -EINVAL;
> }
> }
>
> - /*
> - * TODO: Domain have capabilities that might change as we add
> - * groups (see iommu->cache, currently never set). Check for
> - * them and potentially disallow groups to be attached when it
> - * would change capabilities (ugh).
> - */
> - ret = iommu_attach_group(iommu->domain, iommu_group);
> - if (ret) {
> - mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> - kfree(group);
> - return ret;
> + group = kzalloc(sizeof(*group), GFP_KERNEL);
> + domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!group || !domain) {
> + ret = -ENOMEM;
> + goto out_free;
> }
>
> group->iommu_group = iommu_group;
> - list_add(&group->next, &iommu->group_list);
> +
> + /* Determine bus_type in order to allocate a domain */
> + ret = iommu_group_for_each_dev(iommu_group, domain, vfio_bus_type);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_free;
> +
> + domain->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(domain->bus);
> + if (!domain->domain) {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + goto out_free;
> + }
> +
> + ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_domain;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&domain->group_list);
> + list_add(&group->next, &domain->group_list);
> +
> + if (!allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> + !iommu_domain_has_cap(domain->domain, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP)) {
> + pr_warn("%s: No interrupt remapping support. Use the module param
> \"allow_unsafe_interrupts\" to enable VFIO IOMMU support on this platform\n",
> + __func__);
> + ret = -EPERM;
> + goto out_detach;
> + }
> +
> + if (iommu_domain_has_cap(domain->domain, IOMMU_CAP_CACHE_COHERENCY))
> + domain->prot |= IOMMU_CACHE;
> +
> + /* Try to match an existing compatible domain. */
> + list_for_each_entry(d, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + if (d->bus == domain->bus && d->prot == domain->prot) {
Are not we talking about allowing a domain to support different bus type if domain/iommu-group properties matches.
> + iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> + if (!iommu_attach_group(d->domain, iommu_group)) {
> + list_add(&group->next, &d->group_list);
> + iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> + kfree(domain);
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + ret = iommu_attach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_domain;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + /* replay mappings on new domains */
> + ret = vfio_iommu_replay(iommu, domain);
IIUC; We created a new domain because an already existing domain does not have same attribute; say domain->prot;
But in vfio_iommu_replay() we pick up any domain, first domain, and create mapping accordingly.
Should not we use attributes of this domain otherwise we may get "reserved bit faults"?
Thanks
-Bharat
> + if (ret)
> + goto out_detach;
> +
> + list_add(&domain->next, &iommu->domain_list);
>
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
>
> return 0;
> +
> +out_detach:
> + iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> +out_domain:
> + iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> +out_free:
> + kfree(domain);
> + kfree(group);
> + mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
> +{
> + struct rb_node *node;
> +
> + while ((node = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list)))
> + vfio_remove_dma(iommu, rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node));
> }
>
> static void vfio_iommu_type1_detach_group(void *iommu_data,
> struct iommu_group *iommu_group)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain;
> struct vfio_group *group;
>
> mutex_lock(&iommu->lock);
>
> - list_for_each_entry(group, &iommu->group_list, next) {
> - if (group->iommu_group == iommu_group) {
> - iommu_detach_group(iommu->domain, iommu_group);
> + list_for_each_entry(domain, &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + list_for_each_entry(group, &domain->group_list, next) {
> + if (group->iommu_group != iommu_group)
> + continue;
> +
> + iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, iommu_group);
> list_del(&group->next);
> kfree(group);
> - break;
> + /*
> + * Group ownership provides privilege, if the group
> + * list is empty, the domain goes away. If it's the
> + * last domain, then all the mappings go away too.
> + */
> + if (list_empty(&domain->group_list)) {
> + if (list_is_singular(&iommu->domain_list))
> + vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
> + iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> + list_del(&domain->next);
> + kfree(domain);
> + }
> + goto done;
> }
> }
>
> +done:
> mutex_unlock(&iommu->lock);
> }
>
> @@ -769,40 +821,17 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu;
>
> - if (arg != VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU)
> + if (arg != VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU || arg != VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU)
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> iommu = kzalloc(sizeof(*iommu), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!iommu)
> return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
>
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->group_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->domain_list);
> iommu->dma_list = RB_ROOT;
> mutex_init(&iommu->lock);
> -
> - /*
> - * Wish we didn't have to know about bus_type here.
> - */
> - iommu->domain = iommu_domain_alloc(&pci_bus_type);
> - if (!iommu->domain) {
> - kfree(iommu);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * Wish we could specify required capabilities rather than create
> - * a domain, see what comes out and hope it doesn't change along
> - * the way. Fortunately we know interrupt remapping is global for
> - * our iommus.
> - */
> - if (!allow_unsafe_interrupts &&
> - !iommu_domain_has_cap(iommu->domain, IOMMU_CAP_INTR_REMAP)) {
> - pr_warn("%s: No interrupt remapping support. Use the module param
> \"allow_unsafe_interrupts\" to enable VFIO IOMMU support on this platform\n",
> - __func__);
> - iommu_domain_free(iommu->domain);
> - kfree(iommu);
> - return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
> - }
> + iommu->v2 = (arg == VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU);
>
> return iommu;
> }
> @@ -810,25 +839,24 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
> static void vfio_iommu_type1_release(void *iommu_data)
> {
> struct vfio_iommu *iommu = iommu_data;
> + struct vfio_domain *domain, *domain_tmp;
> struct vfio_group *group, *group_tmp;
> - struct rb_node *node;
>
> - list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp, &iommu->group_list, next) {
> - iommu_detach_group(iommu->domain, group->iommu_group);
> - list_del(&group->next);
> - kfree(group);
> - }
> + vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(iommu);
>
> - while ((node = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list))) {
> - struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node);
> - size_t size = dma->size;
> - vfio_remove_dma_overlap(iommu, dma->iova, &size, dma);
> - if (WARN_ON(!size))
> - break;
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(domain, domain_tmp,
> + &iommu->domain_list, next) {
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(group, group_tmp,
> + &domain->group_list, next) {
> + iommu_detach_group(domain->domain, group->iommu_group);
> + list_del(&group->next);
> + kfree(group);
> + }
> + iommu_domain_free(domain->domain);
> + list_del(&domain->next);
> + kfree(domain);
> }
>
> - iommu_domain_free(iommu->domain);
> - iommu->domain = NULL;
> kfree(iommu);
> }
>
> @@ -858,7 +886,7 @@ static long vfio_iommu_type1_ioctl(void *iommu_data,
>
> info.flags = 0;
>
> - info.iova_pgsizes = iommu->domain->ops->pgsize_bitmap;
> + info.iova_pgsizes = vfio_pgsize_bitmap(iommu);
>
> return copy_to_user((void __user *)arg, &info, minsz);
>
> @@ -911,9 +939,6 @@ static const struct vfio_iommu_driver_ops
> vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1 = {
>
> static int __init vfio_iommu_type1_init(void)
> {
> - if (!iommu_present(&pci_bus_type))
> - return -ENODEV;
> -
> return vfio_register_iommu_driver(&vfio_iommu_driver_ops_type1);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> index 0fd47f5..460fdf2 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/vfio.h
> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
>
> #define VFIO_TYPE1_IOMMU 1
> #define VFIO_SPAPR_TCE_IOMMU 2
> +#define VFIO_TYPE1v2_IOMMU 3
>
> /*
> * The IOCTL interface is designed for extensibility by embedding the
>
> _______________________________________________
> iommu mailing list
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists