[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYKwaH5DX27irzmcTDAMhQMUhuzz6N7mjKWv9tZchv0Ug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 09:26:50 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] clocksource / acpi: Add macro CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 1:25 PM, Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org> wrote:
> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
>
> This macro does the same job as CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE. The device
> name from the ACPI timer table is matched with all the registered
> timer controllers and matching initialisation routine is invoked.
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>
Actually I have a fat patch renaming CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE()
to TIMER_OF_DECLARE() and I think this macro, if needed, should
be named TIMER_ACPI_DECLARE().
The reason is that "clocksource" is a Linux-internal name and this
macro pertains to the hardware name in respective system
description type.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE(name, compat, fn) \
> + static const struct acpi_device_id __clksrc_acpi_table_##name \
> + __used __section(__clksrc_acpi_table) \
> + = { .id = compat, \
> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)fn }
> +#else
> +#define CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE(name, compat, fn)
> +#endif
This hammers down the world to compile one binary for ACPI
and one binary for device tree. Maybe that's fine, I don't know.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists