[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52DF990B.4060703@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 10:10:19 +0000
From: Chris Redpath <Chris.Redpath@....com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"pjt@...gle.com" <pjt@...gle.com>,
"bsegall@...gle.com" <bsegall@...gle.com>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched: fix sched_entity avg statistics update
On 21/01/14 16:12, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> With the current implementation, the load average statistics of a sched entity
> change according to other activity on the CPU even if this activity is done
> between the running window of the sched entity and have no influence on the
> running duration of the task.
>
> When a task wakes up on the same CPU, we currently update last_runnable_update
> with the return of __synchronize_entity_decay without updating the
> runnable_avg_sum and runnable_avg_period accordingly. In fact, we have to sync
> the load_contrib of the se with the rq's blocked_load_contrib before removing
> it from the latter (with __synchronize_entity_decay) but we must keep
> last_runnable_update unchanged for updating runnable_avg_sum/period during the
> next update_entity_load_avg.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index e64b079..5b0ef90 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -2370,8 +2370,7 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
> * would have made count negative); we must be careful to avoid
> * double-accounting blocked time after synchronizing decays.
> */
> - se->avg.last_runnable_update += __synchronize_entity_decay(se)
> - << 20;
> + __synchronize_entity_decay(se);
> }
>
> /* migrated tasks did not contribute to our blocked load */
>
I've noticed this problem too. It becomes more apparent if you are
closely inspecting load signals and comparing against ideal signals
generated from task runtime traces. IMO it should be fixed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists