[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3140612.0s75qS6VKb@wuerfel>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:56:05 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
"patches@...aro.org" <patches@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-acpi@...ts.linaro.org>,
Charles Garcia-Tobin <Charles.Garcia-Tobin@....com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 18/20] clocksource / acpi: Add macro CLOCKSOURCE_ACPI_DECLARE
On Wednesday 22 January 2014 11:46:16 Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 09:08:32AM +0000, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > On 2014-1-17 22:21, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Friday 17 January 2014, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> > >>
> > >> From: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
> > >>
> > >> This macro does the same job as CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE. The device
> > >> name from the ACPI timer table is matched with all the registered
> > >> timer controllers and matching initialisation routine is invoked.
> > >
> > > I wouldn't anticipate this infrastructure to be required. Shouldn't all
> > > ARMv8 machines have an architected timer?
> >
> > I not sure of this, could anyone can give some guidance? if only arch
> > timer is available for ARM64, this will make thing very simple.
>
> All ARMv8 systems should have an architected timer.
>
> However, they may also have other timers (e.g. global timers for use
> when CPUs are in low power states and their local architected timers
> aren't active).
But all other timers could be regular platform drivers I suppose. No
need for special infrastructure for those.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists