linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: exynos: Fix build error of no type of module

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <1390402760.18340.6.camel@AMDC1943>
Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 15:59:20 +0100
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: exynos: Fix build error of no type of
 module_init

On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 20:12 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 22 January 2014 19:51, Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com> wrote:
> > Add missing include to fix build error:
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘module_init’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [enabled by default]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: warning: data definition has no type or storage class [enabled by default]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: error: type defaults to ‘int’ in declaration of ‘module_exit’ [-Werror=implicit-int]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: warning: parameter names (without types) in function declaration [enabled by default]
> > drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c:292:1: warning: ‘exynos_cpufreq_platdrv_init’ defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> > make[2]: *** [drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.o] Error 1
> > make[1]: *** [drivers/cpufreq] Error 2
> >
> > Build error happens on gcc version 4.6.3 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.3-1ubuntu5)
> > and was introduced by commit d568b6f71df1 (cpufreq: exynos: Convert
> > exynos-cpufreq to platform driver).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
> > Cc: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c |    1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > index fcd2914d081a..fa54c2b88dd7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
> >  #include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> >  #include <linux/suspend.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> >  #include <linux/platform_device.h>
> 
> I am surprised how that patch went through then? And nothing was
> reported by kbuild for it..

Hi,

A little more explanation from my side: the build error actually happens
only on next/master, not Linus' tree.

Mentioned commit which changes the driver to platform driver is in
mainline since 3.12-rc2 so it seems this is not the cause of the build
error. I think I need to find first the real cause of this build error.

Best regards,
Krzysztof



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/