[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+5PVA5pO_SWpfLGEwWHXDTFyANsiyWYo_t5R3pGj4TOhDgbOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:17:58 -0500
From: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Eliezer Tamir <eliezer.tamir@...ux.intel.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com,
Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/15] sched: Use a static_key for sched_clock_stable
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Markus Trippelsdorf
<markus@...ppelsdorf.de> wrote:
> On 2014.01.22 at 19:42 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 07:35:38PM +0100, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote:
>>
>> > >FYI it happens on real hardware on my machine:
>>
>> > >[ 60.375384] process: using AMD E400 aware idle routine
>>
>> > But this is a different issue. I've bisected it to:
>> >
>> > commit 20d1c86a57762f0a33a78988e3fc8818316badd4
>> > Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
>> > Date: Fri Nov 29 15:40:29 2013 +0100
>> >
>> > sched/clock, x86: Rewrite cyc2ns() to avoid the need to disable IRQs
>> >
>> > Reverting the commit "fixes" the issue:
>>
>> Hurm.. what kind of AMD machine is that?
>
> It's an ancient one:
>
> processor : 0
> vendor_id : AuthenticAMD
> cpu family : 16
> model : 4
> model name : AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 955 Processor
> stepping : 2
> microcode : 0x10000db
> cpu MHz : 800.000
> cache size : 512 KB
> physical id : 0
> siblings : 4
> core id : 0
> cpu cores : 4
> apicid : 0
> initial apicid : 0
> fpu : yes
> fpu_exception : yes
> cpuid level : 5
> wp : yes
> flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ht syscall nx mmxext fxsr_opt pdpe1gb rdtscp lm 3dnowext 3
> dnow constant_tsc rep_good nopl nonstop_tsc extd_apicid pni monitor cx16 popcnt lahf_lm cmp_legacy svm extapic cr8_legacy abm sse4a misalignsse 3dnowprefetch osvw ibs skinit
> wdt hw_pstate npt lbrv svm_lock nrip_save
> bogomips : 6424.73
> TLB size : 1024 4K pages
> clflush size : 64
> cache_alignment : 64
> address sizes : 48 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
> power management: ts ttp tm stc 100mhzsteps hwpstate
I'm seeing the odd printk timestamp jump going from 0.xxx to 49.xx on
an i7-2600 so it isn't just old hardware.
[ 0.000000] kmemleak: Kernel memory leak detector disabled
[ 0.000000] ODEBUG: 32 of 32 active objects replaced
[ 0.000000] hpet clockevent registered
[ 0.000000] tsc: Fast TSC calibration using PIT
[ 0.001000] tsc: Detected 3392.351 MHz processor
[ 49.777360] Calibrating delay loop (skipped), value calculated
using timer frequency.. 6784.70 BogoMIPS (lpj=3392351)
[ 49.777363] pid_max: default: 32768 minimum: 301
[ 49.777572] Security Framework initialized
josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists