[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1390421691.1198.43.camel@ret.masoncoding.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 20:13:20 +0000
From: Chris Mason <clm@...com>
To: "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
"lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org"
<lsf-pc@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"rwheeler@...hat.com" <rwheeler@...hat.com>,
"James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com"
<James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mgorman@...e.de" <mgorman@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [Lsf-pc] [LSF/MM TOPIC] really large storage sectors - going
beyond 4096 bytes
On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 11:50 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 11:30:19 -0800 James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> > But this, I think, is the fundamental point for debate. If we can pull
> > alignment and other tricks to solve 99% of the problem is there a need
> > for radical VM surgery? Is there anything coming down the pipe in the
> > future that may move the devices ahead of the tricks?
>
> I expect it would be relatively simple to get large blocksizes working
> on powerpc with 64k PAGE_SIZE. So before diving in and doing huge
> amounts of work, perhaps someone can do a proof-of-concept on powerpc
> (or ia64) with 64k blocksize.
Maybe 5 drives in raid5 on MD, with 4K coming from each drive. Well
aligned 16K IO will work, everything else will about the same as a rmw
from a single drive.
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists