[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140122124107.ef0ceac16be17c165de56308@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:41:07 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Philipp Hachtmann <phacht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, liuj97@...il.com, santosh.shilimkar@...com,
grygorii.strashko@...com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
robin.m.holt@...il.com, tangchen@...fujitsu.com,
yinghai@...nel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 2/3] mm/memblock: Add support for excluded memory
areas
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014 12:18:21 +0100 Philipp Hachtmann <phacht@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> I'd like to remind that the s390 development relies on this patch
> (and the next one, for cleanliness, of course) being added. It would be
> very good to see it being added to the -mm tree resp. linux-next.
>
Once the patch has passed review (hopefully by yinghai, who reviews
very well) I'd ask you to include it in the s390 tree which actually
uses it.
Patch 2/3 would benefit from a more complete changelog. Why does s390
need CONFIG_ARCH_MEMBLOCK_NOMAP? How is it used and how does it work?
Do we expect other architectures to use it? If so, how? etcetera.
btw, you have a "#ifdef ARCH_MEMBLOCK_NOMAP" in there which should be
CONFIG_ARCH_MEMBLOCK_NOMAP. I don't see how the code could have
compiled as-is - __next_mapped_mem_range() will be omitted?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists