linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] x86: don't introduce more __cpuinit users in intel_mid_weak

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jan 2014 17:10:47 -0500
From:	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Cohen <david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <x86@...nel.org>,
	<fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
	Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
	<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
	Fei Yang <fei.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: don't introduce more __cpuinit users in intel_mid_weak_decls.h

On 14-01-22 05:03 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 01:50 PM, David Cohen wrote:
>>>  
>>> -void * __cpuinit get_penwell_ops()
>>> +void *get_penwell_ops()
>>>  {
>>>  	return &penwell_ops;
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -void * __cpuinit get_cloverview_ops()
>>> +void *get_cloverview_ops()
>>>  {
>>>  	return &penwell_ops;
>>>  }
>>
> 
> Can someone also find and fix the missing (void)s?

Sure, I can do that, if nobody else wants to.

P.
--

> 
> 	-hpa
> 
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/