linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] qrwlock, x86 - Treat all data type not bigger than long as atomic in x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52DF4C38.7040003@hp.com>
Date:	Tue, 21 Jan 2014 23:42:32 -0500
From:	Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linux-arch@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/5] qrwlock, x86 - Treat all data type not bigger
 than long as atomic in x86

On 01/21/2014 07:31 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Waiman Long<waiman.long@...com>  wrote:
>> include/linux/compiler.h:
>>
>> #ifndef __native_word
>> # ifdef __arch_native_word(t)
>> #  define __native_word(t)      __arch_native_word(t)
>> # else
>> #  define __native_word(t) (sizeof(t) == sizeof(int) || sizeof(t) == siizeof(long))
>> # endif
>> #endif
> Do we even really need this?
>
> I'd suggest removing it entirely. You might want to retain the whole
>
>    compiletime_assert_atomic_type()
>
> thing on purely the alpha side, but then it's all inside just the
> alpha code, without any need for this "native_word" thing.
>
> And if somebody tries to do a "smp_store_release()" on a random
> structure or union, do we care? We're not some nanny state that wants
> to give nice warnings for insane code.
>
>                Linus

That sounds good to me too. Peter, what do you think about this?

-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/