linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use task_nice() in function __update_max

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 09:26:30 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	fweisbec@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: Use task_nice() in function __update_max_tr()
 to get the nice value of task.

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 12:11:04PM -0500, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> On 01/22/2014 11:00 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> >Bah, I just noticed that TASK_NICE is in kernel/sched/sched.h not
> >include/linux/sched.h
> >
> >Peter, is there a reason that task_nice() is not a static inline in
> >sched.h and have these macros there too? They only reference fields in
> >task_struct that are already defined there. I don't see why they need
> >to be private to kernel/sched.
> 
> Agree. These macros are useful to other modules out of kernel/sched.
> But they are private to kernel/sched currently.

And the floodgates open.. _why_ would a module care about nice values?
That's sounds just so full of wrong.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/