[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123115632.6d3f1a58@ipc1.ka-ro>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:56:32 +0100
From: Lothar Waßmann <LW@...O-electronics.de>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PWM: let of_xlate handlers check args count
Hi,
Sascha Hauer wrote:
> of_pwm_n_cells for the of_xlate handler is stored in struct pwm_chip,
> but it is only ever used by the of_xlate handler itsel. Remove
> of_pwm_n_cells from struct pwm_chip and let the handler do the argument
> count checking to simplify the code.
>
This still does not make the PWM_POLARITY flag in the pwms node
optional as was the goal because of_parse_phandle_with_args() requires
at least #pwm-cells arguments in the node.
So, with a DT configuration like:
pwm0: pwm@0 {
#pwm-cells = <3>;
};
backlight {
pwms = <&pwm0 0 100000>;
};
the driver will bail out at of_parse_phandle_with_args() in
of_pwm_get() with the error message:
"/backlight: arguments longer than property" and never reach your
clever xlate function.
Thus you will still need to replace of_parse_phandle_with_args()
with different code that copies most but not all of the functionality.
Lothar Waßmann
--
___________________________________________________________
Ka-Ro electronics GmbH | Pascalstraße 22 | D - 52076 Aachen
Phone: +49 2408 1402-0 | Fax: +49 2408 1402-10
Geschäftsführer: Matthias Kaussen
Handelsregistereintrag: Amtsgericht Aachen, HRB 4996
www.karo-electronics.de | info@...o-electronics.de
___________________________________________________________
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists