[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123125219.GC28527@ulmo.nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:52:20 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...il.com>,
Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: Remove obsolete HAVE_PWM Kconfig symbol
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:01:34PM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> Before we had the PWM framework we used to have a barebone PWM api. The
> HAVE_PWM Kconfig symbol used to be selected by the PWM drivers to specify
> the PWM API is present in the kernel. Since the last legacy driver is gone
> the HAVE_PWM symbol can go aswell.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> ---
>
> I suggest that Thierry as PWM Maintainer takes the patch through his tree.
> Is that ok for you Thierry?
Yes, that'd be my preference as well. Perhaps you can resend and add a
few more people on Cc. In particular I'd like at least Russell's (ARM)
and Ralf's (MIPS) Acked-by. Dmitry was already Cc'ed for input/misc.
The patch is rather minimal, but I'd still like to give them an
opportunity to object or at least see the patch.
Thanks,
Thierry
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists