linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/21] perf tools: Introduce struct hist_entry

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:44:00 +0100
From:	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To:	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>,
	Rodrigo Campos <rodrigo@...g.com.ar>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/21] perf tools: Introduce struct hist_entry_iter

On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:13:45AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> There're some duplicate code when adding hist entries.  They are
> different in that some have branch info or mem info but generally do
> same thing.  So introduce new struct hist_entry_iter and add callbacks
> to customize each case in general way.
> 
> The new perf_evsel__add_entry() function will look like:
> 
>   iter->prepare_entry();
>   iter->add_single_entry();
> 
>   while (iter->next_entry())
>     iter->add_next_entry();
> 
>   iter->finish_entry();
> 
> This will help further work like the cumulative callchain patchset.
> 
> Tested-by: Arun Sharma <asharma@...com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>
> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-report.c | 172 +++----------------------
>  tools/perf/util/hist.c      | 304 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/hist.h      |  34 +++++
>  3 files changed, 356 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> index 7ddea46594ae..b6618ecb474a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-report.c
> @@ -85,144 +85,6 @@ static int report__config(const char *var, const char *value, void *cb)
>  	return perf_default_config(var, value, cb);
>  }
>  
> -static int report__add_mem_hist_entry(struct perf_tool *tool, struct addr_location *al,
> -				      struct perf_sample *sample, struct perf_evsel *evsel,
> -				      union perf_event *event)
> -{
> -	struct report *rep = container_of(tool, struct report, tool);
> -	struct symbol *parent = NULL;
> -	u8 cpumode = event->header.misc & PERF_RECORD_MISC_CPUMODE_MASK;
> -	struct hist_entry *he;
> -	struct mem_info *mi, *mx;
> -	uint64_t cost;
> -	int err = sample__resolve_callchain(sample, &parent, evsel, al, rep->max_stack);
> -
> -	if (err)
> -		return err;
> -
> -	mi = machine__resolve_mem(al->machine, al->thread, sample, cpumode);
> -	if (!mi)
> -		return -ENOMEM;
> -
> -	if (rep->hide_unresolved && !al->sym)
> -		return 0;

this check seems to be missing in iter_add_single_mem_entry

jirka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/