[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123151123.GE8586@lee--X1>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:11:23 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Linux Input <linux-input@...r.kernel.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3 RESEND] mfd: tc3589x: Reform device tree probing
> > Patch looks good to me. Is there any reason why we should rush this in
> > for v3.14, or is it okay to go to -next?
>
> No rush, but it's been on review like forever so unless there is
> some noise from the DT people at -rc1 I'd be very happy if you
> could apply patches 1 & 2 by then.
I'm just waiting for their Ack. If I don't have it soon I'll review it
myself and any changes will have to come in via subsequent patch
submissions.
I think it's sensible to head for v3.15 for this set.
> The third one can be applied out-of-order to the input tree after
> that.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists