linux-kernel - [PATCH 3.12 17/27] nilfs2: fix segctor bug that causes file system corruption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140123190650.465416100@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:06:54 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@....net>,
	Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.12 17/27] nilfs2: fix segctor bug that causes file system corruption

3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@....net>

commit 70f2fe3a26248724d8a5019681a869abdaf3e89a upstream.

There is a bug in the function nilfs_segctor_collect, which results in
active data being written to a segment, that is marked as clean.  It is
possible, that this segment is selected for a later segment
construction, whereby the old data is overwritten.

The problem shows itself with the following kernel log message:

  nilfs_sufile_do_cancel_free: segment 6533 must be clean

Usually a few hours later the file system gets corrupted:

  NILFS: bad btree node (blocknr=8748107): level = 0, flags = 0x0, nchildren = 0
  NILFS error (device sdc1): nilfs_bmap_last_key: broken bmap (inode number=114660)

The issue can be reproduced with a file system that is nearly full and
with the cleaner running, while some IO intensive task is running.
Although it is quite hard to reproduce.

This is what happens:

 1. The cleaner starts the segment construction
 2. nilfs_segctor_collect is called
 3. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_SUFILE and segments are freed
 4. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_DAT current segment is full
 5. nilfs_segctor_extend_segments is called, which
    allocates a new segment
 6. The new segment is one of the segments freed in step 3
 7. nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev is called and produces an error message
 8. Loop around and the collection starts again
 9. sc_stage is on NILFS_ST_SUFILE and segments are freed
    including the newly allocated segment, which will contain active
    data and can be allocated at a later time
10. A few hours later another segment construction allocates the
    segment and causes file system corruption

This can be prevented by simply reordering the statements.  If
nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev is called before nilfs_segctor_extend_segments
the freed segments are marked as dirty and cannot be allocated any more.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@....net>
Reviewed-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Tested-by: Andreas Rohner <andreas.rohner@....net>
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@....ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |   10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
+++ b/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -1440,17 +1440,19 @@ static int nilfs_segctor_collect(struct
 
 		nilfs_clear_logs(&sci->sc_segbufs);
 
-		err = nilfs_segctor_extend_segments(sci, nilfs, nadd);
-		if (unlikely(err))
-			return err;
-
 		if (sci->sc_stage.flags & NILFS_CF_SUFREED) {
 			err = nilfs_sufile_cancel_freev(nilfs->ns_sufile,
 							sci->sc_freesegs,
 							sci->sc_nfreesegs,
 							NULL);
 			WARN_ON(err); /* do not happen */
+			sci->sc_stage.flags &= ~NILFS_CF_SUFREED;
 		}
+
+		err = nilfs_segctor_extend_segments(sci, nilfs, nadd);
+		if (unlikely(err))
+			return err;
+
 		nadd = min_t(int, nadd << 1, SC_MAX_SEGDELTA);
 		sci->sc_stage = prev_stage;
 	}


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/