linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: Ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY on VMA merging, v2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:02:35 -0800
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc:	Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, gnome@...t.net,
	grawoc@...krefraction.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY on VMA merging, v2

On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:14:45 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:

> VM_SOFTDIRTY bit affects vma merge routine: if two VMAs has all
> bits in vm_flags matched except dirty bit the kernel can't longer
> merge them and this forces the kernel to generate new VMAs instead.

Do you intend to alter the brk() and binprm code to set VM_SOFTDIRTY?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/