[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140123130235.61e2eca44d92b37936955ff1@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:02:35 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, gnome@...t.net,
grawoc@...krefraction.com, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: Ignore VM_SOFTDIRTY on VMA merging, v2
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 19:14:45 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com> wrote:
> VM_SOFTDIRTY bit affects vma merge routine: if two VMAs has all
> bits in vm_flags matched except dirty bit the kernel can't longer
> merge them and this forces the kernel to generate new VMAs instead.
Do you intend to alter the brk() and binprm code to set VM_SOFTDIRTY?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists