[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123213321.372ce82b@www.etchedpixels.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:33:21 +0000
From: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
jslaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register_driver call to
device probe
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 20:05:09 +0000
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:51:44PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > That strikes me as rather more risky. We can propogate it through the
> > drivers as we are sure it is safe to do so on that platform and encourage
> > driver authors to migrate. Better than a "big bang" and the inevitable
> > fallout.
>
> I don't see how we can meaningfully test this on a platform - the kernel
> would have to be pretty demented to care, it's userspace that cares and
> that's not really tied to individual serial drivers but is where we
> mainly need coverage.
Which is why I think we want to enable it gradually and platform by
platform as that platform or arch maintainer judges it appropriate given
their knowledge of their platform(s).
Alan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists