[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E18E57.8040600@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 21:49:11 +0000
From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <ian.campbell@...rix.com>, <wei.liu2@...rix.com>,
<xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <jonathan.davies@...rix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v5 0/9] xen-netback: TX grant mapping with SKBTX_DEV_ZEROCOPY
instead of copy
On 23/01/14 21:39, David Miller wrote:
> From: Zoltan Kiss <zoltan.kiss@...rix.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 13:13:07 +0000
>
>> It is already based on two predecessor patches, one which is already
>> accepted but not applied yet:
>>
>> [PATCH net-next v2] xen-netback: Rework rx_work_todo
>>
>> And the other one is hopefully will be accepted very soon:
>>
>> [PATCH v5] xen/grant-table: Avoid m2p_override during mapping
>
> These have both been asked for changes or small adjustments to be made.
AFAIK Wei acked the netback one:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg267800.html
I've just sent in the latest one for the grant mapping one
> Also, you really have to precisely and explicitly mention any
> dependencies which exist.
Ok, the grant mapping API dependency is vaguely mentioned in the patch
history, I'll move it. I haven't mentioned the other one because it's
not related to the grant mapping changes, it's a generic bug.
> In fact, it's often best to not post a series until the dependent
> patches have been accepted.
I've posted the first version of this series in November, these two
issues turned up in the recent weeks.
Zoli
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists