[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140123223136.GA18468@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:31:36 -0500
From: Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] numa, mem-hotplug: Fix stack overflow in numa when
seting kernel nodes to unhotpluggable.
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:58:24AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote:
> 128 bytes is a pretty small amount of stack though, so I'm just as confused
> as to what the actual bug here is.
>
> After trying the proposed fix, I got another oops in the early init code..
>
> <trace>
> nr_free_zone_pages
> nr_free_pagecache_pages
> build_all_zonelists
> start_kernel
> <rip> ffffffffbc164b1e next_zones_zonelist
> <rsp> ffffffffbcc01f00
Ok, this is crashing here in next_zones_zonelist...
while (zonelist_zone_idx(z) > highest_zoneidx)
de: 3b 77 08 cmp 0x8(%rdi),%esi
I stuck this at the top of the function..
printk(KERN_ERR "z:%p nodes:%p highest:%d\n", z, nodes, highest_zoneidx);
and got
z: 1d08 nodes: (null) highest:3
Some build tests show..
MAXSMP ( NODESHIFT=10 ) : Bug
NRCPUS=4 & NODESHIFT=10 : Bug
NRCPUS=4 & NODESHIFT=1 : no bug
The middle config test was accidental, I hadn't realised disabling MAXSMP
wouldn't reset NODESHIFT to something sane.
I'll start bisecting, as MAXSMP worked fine until a few days ago.
Dave
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists