| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1390448559-33896-1-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 11:42:39 +0800
From: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
CC: <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
<konrad.wilk@...cle.com>, "David Airlie" <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
<intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5] ACPI: Fix acpi_evaluate_object() return value check
Since acpi_evaluate_object() returns acpi_status and not plain int,
ACPI_FAILURE() should be used for checking its return value. Also
add some detailed debug info when acpi_evaluate_object() failed.
Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>
---
v4->v5: Add some detailed debug info for acpi_evaluate_object()
failure suggested by Bjorn.
v3->v4: Fix spell error, add Jani Nikula reviewed-by.
v2->v3: Fix compile error pointed out by Hanjun.
v1->v2: Add CC to related subsystem MAINTAINERS
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++-------
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c | 13 ++++++---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c | 25 +++++++++++-------
drivers/pci/pci-label.c | 10 +++++--
4 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c
index dfff090..e7b526b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_acpi.c
@@ -31,11 +31,13 @@ static const u8 intel_dsm_guid[] = {
static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func)
{
struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct acpi_buffer string = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
struct acpi_object_list input;
union acpi_object params[4];
union acpi_object *obj;
u32 result;
- int ret = 0;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int ret;
input.count = 4;
input.pointer = params;
@@ -50,10 +52,14 @@ static int intel_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func)
params[3].package.count = 0;
params[3].package.elements = NULL;
- ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to evaluate _DSM: %d\n", ret);
- return ret;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &string);
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+ "failed to evaluate _DSM for %s, exit status %u\n",
+ (char *)string.pointer, (unsigned int)status);
+ kfree(string.pointer);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;
@@ -138,10 +144,12 @@ static char *intel_dsm_mux_type(u8 type)
static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void)
{
struct acpi_buffer output = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct acpi_buffer string = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
struct acpi_object_list input;
union acpi_object params[4];
union acpi_object *pkg;
- int i, ret;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int i;
input.count = 4;
input.pointer = params;
@@ -156,10 +164,15 @@ static void intel_dsm_platform_mux_info(void)
params[3].package.count = 0;
params[3].package.elements = NULL;
- ret = acpi_evaluate_object(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle, "_DSM", &input,
- &output);
- if (ret) {
- DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("failed to evaluate _DSM: %d\n", ret);
+ acpi_status = acpi_evaluate_object(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle,
+ "_DSM", &input, &output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_get_name(intel_dsm_priv.dhandle,
+ ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &string);
+ DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER(
+ "failed to evaluate _DSM for %s, exit status %u\n",
+ (char *)string.pointer, (unsigned int)status);
+ kfree(string.pointer);
goto out;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c
index 1291204..c30ee88 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/core/subdev/mxm/base.c
@@ -112,17 +112,22 @@ mxm_shadow_dsm(struct nouveau_mxm *mxm, u8 version)
};
struct acpi_object_list list = { ARRAY_SIZE(args), args };
struct acpi_buffer retn = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
+ struct acpi_buffer string = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
union acpi_object *obj;
acpi_handle handle;
- int ret;
+ acpi_status status;
handle = ACPI_HANDLE(&device->pdev->dev);
if (!handle)
return false;
- ret = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &list, &retn);
- if (ret) {
- nv_debug(mxm, "DSM MXMS failed: %d\n", ret);
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &list, &retn);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_get_name(handle, ACPI_FULL_PATHNAME, &string);
+ nv_debug(mxm, "DSM MXMS failed for %s: exit status %u\n",
+ (char *)string.pointer,
+ (unsigned int)status);
+ kfree(string.pointer);
return false;
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
index ba0183f..53d24a7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_acpi.c
@@ -82,7 +82,8 @@ static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *
struct acpi_object_list input;
union acpi_object params[4];
union acpi_object *obj;
- int i, err;
+ acpi_status status;
+ int i;
char args_buff[4];
input.count = 4;
@@ -101,10 +102,12 @@ static int nouveau_optimus_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *
args_buff[i] = (arg >> i * 8) & 0xFF;
params[3].buffer.pointer = args_buff;
- err = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
- if (err) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "failed to evaluate _DSM: %d\n", err);
- return err;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_handle_info(handle,
+ "failed to evaluate _DSM, exit status %u\n",
+ (unsigned int)status);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;
@@ -134,7 +137,7 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *result)
struct acpi_object_list input;
union acpi_object params[4];
union acpi_object *obj;
- int err;
+ acpi_status status;
input.count = 4;
input.pointer = params;
@@ -148,10 +151,12 @@ static int nouveau_dsm(acpi_handle handle, int func, int arg, uint32_t *result)
params[3].type = ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER;
params[3].integer.value = arg;
- err = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
- if (err) {
- printk(KERN_INFO "failed to evaluate _DSM: %d\n", err);
- return err;
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, &output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_handle_info(handle,
+ "failed to evaluate _DSM, exit status %u\n",
+ (unsigned int)status);
+ return -EINVAL;
}
obj = (union acpi_object *)output.pointer;
diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
index d51f45a..0216094 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/pci-label.c
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ dsm_get_label(acpi_handle handle, int func,
union acpi_object *obj;
int len = 0;
- int err;
+ acpi_status status;
input.count = 4;
input.pointer = params;
@@ -228,9 +228,13 @@ dsm_get_label(acpi_handle handle, int func,
params[3].package.count = 0;
params[3].package.elements = NULL;
- err = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, output);
- if (err)
+ status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, "_DSM", &input, output);
+ if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
+ acpi_handle_info(handle,
+ "failed to evaluate _DSM, exit status %u\n",
+ (unsigned int)status);
return -1;
+ }
obj = (union acpi_object *)output->pointer;
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists