[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140124151908.7ef2c0ce@vbox-ubuntu>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 15:19:08 +0100
From: Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ibm.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm: thp: kill the bogus ->def_flags check in
hugepage_madvise()
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 17:43:34 +0100
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 01/22, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> >
> > > hugepage_madvise() checks "mm->def_flags & VM_NOHUGEPAGE" but
> > > this can be never true, currently mm->def_flags can only have
> > > VM_LOCKED.
> >
> > But line 1087 of arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c says
> > mm->def_flags |= VM_NOHUGEPAGE;
> > from 3eabaee998c787e7e1565574821652548f7fc003
> > "KVM: s390: allow sie enablement for multi-threaded programs".
>
> Argh. Thanks Hugh!
>
> Another case when I forgot about /bin/grep. So the patch is wrong,
> at least the changelog is certainly is. I am stupid.
>
> But, perhaps, this all still can work? Looks like, s390 already
> implements PR_SET_THP_DISABLE using the same idea, it would be
> nice to avoid another hack.
>
> Gerald, any chance we can revert 8e72033f2a489 "thp: make
> MADV_HUGEPAGE check for mm->def_flags" ? The changelog says "In order
> to also prevent MADV_HUGEPAGE on such an mm", is it really important?
> I mean, if the application calls madvise(MADV_HUGEPAGE) it should
> probably know what it does and, this can be useful after if
> PR_SET_THP_DISABLE or KVM_S390_ENABLE_SIE. Of course I do not
> understand this code, perhaps MADV_HUGEPAGE is simply impossible.
Yes, after discussion with Martin, I think that commit 8e72033f2a489 can
be reverted if we add a small add-on patch to the s390 gmap code instead,
like this:
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
index 3584ed9..a87cdb4 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -504,6 +504,9 @@ static int gmap_connect_pgtable(unsigned long address, unsigned long segment,
if (!pmd_present(*pmd) &&
__pte_alloc(mm, vma, pmd, vmaddr))
return -ENOMEM;
+ /* large pmds cannot yet be handled */
+ if (pmd_large(*pmd))
+ return -EFAULT;
/* pmd now points to a valid segment table entry. */
rmap = kmalloc(sizeof(*rmap), GFP_KERNEL|__GFP_REPEAT);
if (!rmap)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists