[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E2AC5A.3000005@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 10:09:30 -0800
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: Panic on 8-node system in memblock_virt_alloc_try_nid()
On 01/24/2014 09:45 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 7:01 AM, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>> There are two failure modes I'm seeing: one when (failing to) allocate
>> the first node's mem_map[], and a second where it oopses accessing the
>> numa_distance[] table. This is the numa_distance[] one, and it happens
>> even with the patch you suggested applied.
>>
>>> [ 0.000000] memblock_find_in_range_node():239
>>> [ 0.000000] __memblock_find_range_top_down():150
>>> [ 0.000000] __memblock_find_range_top_down():152 i: 600000001
>>> [ 0.000000] memblock_find_in_range_node():241 ret: 2147479552
>>> [ 0.000000] memblock_reserve: [0x0000007ffff000-0x0000007ffff03f] flags 0x0 numa_set_distance+0xd2/0x252
>
> that address is wrong.
>
> Can you post whole log with current linus' tree + two patches that I
> sent out yesterday?
Here you go. It's still spitting out memblock_reserve messages to the
console. I'm not sure if it's making _some_ progress or not.
https://www.sr71.net/~dave/intel/3.13/dmesg.with-2-patches
But, it's certainly not booting. Do you want to see it without
memblock=debug?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists