linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] Documentation: power: reset: Add documentation for generic SYSCON reboot driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140124181948.GE4758@e106331-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Jan 2014 18:19:48 +0000
From:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
To:	Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Feng Kan <fkan@....com>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 5/5] Documentation: power: reset: Add documentation
 for generic SYSCON reboot driver

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 05:55:13PM +0000, Christopher Covington wrote:
> On 01/24/2014 06:39 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 07:20:01PM +0000, Feng Kan wrote:
> >> Add documentation for generic SYSCON reboot driver.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Feng Kan <fkan@....com>
> >> ---
> >>  .../bindings/power/reset/syscon-reboot.txt         |   16 ++++++++++++++++
> >>  1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/syscon-reboot.txt
> >>
> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/syscon-reboot.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/syscon-reboot.txt
> >> new file mode 100644
> >> index 0000000..e9eb1fe
> >> --- /dev/null
> >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/reset/syscon-reboot.txt
> >> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> >> +Generic SYSCON mapped register reset driver
> > 
> > Bindings should describe hardware, not drivers.
> 
> How is this different than what's done for PSCI?

A PSCI node in the DT defines a standard interface to a firmware which
is external to Linux. The PSCI binding does not contain the word
"driver", but describes the interface that the binding describes, with
reference to approriate documentation.

All I'm arguing for here is a description of the class of hardware this
is applicable to, rather than "this is what this particular driver
uses".

Thanks,
Mark.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/