[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E33DFC.6010706@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 23:30:52 -0500
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, "" <aswin@...com>,
Scott J Norton <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 4/4] qrwlock: Use the mcs_spinlock helper functions
for MCS queuing
On 01/24/2014 03:26 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 11:28:51PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
>> There is a pending MCS lock patch series that adds generic MCS lock
>> helper functions to do MCS-style locking. This patch will enable
>> the queue rwlock to use that generic MCS lock/unlock primitives for
>> internal queuing. This patch should only be merged after the merging
>> of that generic MCS locking patch.
> I would still very much like this patch to be merged into the first. It
> saves having to review all the code removed again.
I will merge it to the first one once the once the MCS patches are in
the mainline or the tip branch.
-Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists