linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] max8925_power: Use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <52E50C24.8030305@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jan 2014 14:22:44 +0100
From:	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To:	Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
CC:	dbaryshkov@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] max8925_power: Use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)" for DT code.

Hi Manish,

On 26.01.2014 08:15, Manish Badarkhe wrote:
> Instead of "#if define CONFIG_OF" use "IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)"
> option for DT code to avoid if-deffery in code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manish Badarkhe <badarkhe.manish@...il.com>
> ---
> :100644 100644 b4513f2... d353fbc... M	drivers/power/max8925_power.c
>   drivers/power/max8925_power.c |   14 +++++---------
>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> index b4513f2..d353fbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/max8925_power.c
> @@ -427,7 +427,6 @@ static int max8925_deinit_charger(struct max8925_power_info *info)
>   	return 0;
>   }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
>   static struct max8925_power_pdata *
>   max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> @@ -468,13 +467,6 @@ max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
>   	return pdata;
>   }
> -#else
> -static struct max8925_power_pdata *
> -max8925_power_dt_init(struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> -	return pdev->dev.platform_data;
> -}
> -#endif
>
>   static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   {
> @@ -483,7 +475,11 @@ static int max8925_power_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   	struct max8925_power_info *info;
>   	int ret;
>
> -	pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> +		pdata = max8925_power_dt_init(pdev);
> +	else
> +		pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;
> +

This does not look much better than before this patch. Instead of 
"if-deffery" outside function bodies you are adding "iffery" (if there 
is such a word) inside a function.

What about adding

	if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
		return pdev->dev.platform_data;

on top of max8925_power_dt_init() instead or maybe also renaming this 
function to max8925_get_pdata()?

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/