[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANN689GDsXunNZAkkv7=CS2ct5m2WNqEODrn2jrvmd99jWDCAw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 06:03:38 -0800
From: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] lib: Export interval_tree
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 5:54 AM, Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 12:24:33PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE(struct interval_tree_node, rb,
>> unsigned long, __subtree_last,
>> START, LAST,, interval_tree)
>> +
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_insert);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_remove);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_first);
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(interval_tree_iter_next);
>
> Hm, I've thought kernel coding style nowadays is to put the EXPORT_SYMBOL
> right below the definition of the function?
INTERVAL_TREE_DEFINE generates the definitions of these functions.
--
Michel "Walken" Lespinasse
A program is never fully debugged until the last user dies.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists