[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFz3Zi_PyQwnCS45XHO-om+XSesBby4g0WS0JcQp5i_m+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:23:30 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org,
Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 4:27 AM, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> - p = proc_create("cells", 0, proc_afs, &afs_proc_cells_fops);
> + p = proc_create("cells", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, proc_afs, &afs_proc_cells_fops);
> - p = proc_create("rootcell", 0, proc_afs, &afs_proc_rootcell_fops);
> + p = proc_create("rootcell", S_IFREG | S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR, proc_afs, &afs_proc_rootcell_fops);
So the S_IFREG isn't necessary.
And quite frankly, I personally think S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR is _less_
readable than 0644. It's damn hard to parse those random letter
combinations, and at least I have to really think about it, in a way
that the octal representation does *not* make me go "I have to think
about that".
So my personal preference would be to just see that simple 0644 in
proc_create. Hmm?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists