[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E57882.6060601@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 22:05:06 +0100
From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
CC: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the clk tree with the arm-soc tree
On 26.01.2014 21:59, Tomasz Figa wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> On 13.01.2014 06:06, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the clk tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos4.c between commit 86576fbe201b ("clk:
>> samsung: exynos4: Fix definition of div_mmc_pre4 divider") from the
>> arm-soc tree and commit 2d7382375054 ("clk: exynos4: replace clock ID
>> private enums with IDs from DT header") from the clk tree.
>>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
>> is required).
>
> It seems like somehow this fix-up has been lost in action and the
> conflict ended up being merged incorrectly in linux-next. Could you take
> a look?
Ehh, it's a false alarm fortunately. I've been looking at wrong ref,
silly me. Sorry for the noise.
Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists