[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E5823E.1080906@redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 16:46:38 -0500
From: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2] x86: allocate cpumask during check irq vectors
On 01/26/2014 03:29 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> I strongly disagree with putting variables in file scope when function scope will do, but I do like to see static variables before automatics. Anyway, this is bikeshedding.
>
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> * H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
>>
>>> s/global/static/, with a big loud comment why it is okay.
>>
>> It would be a global no matter which form we use, but for
>> maintainability reasons I generally prefer a static put right before
>> the function that uses it:
>>
>> static cpumask_t mask;
>>
>> static func(...)
>> {
>> }
>>
>> That makes it really apparent that it's a global - statics are easily
>> missed when hiding amongst local variables.
Okay, thanks for the input -- I'll put something together and test.
P.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ingo
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists