linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140126115402.GA25689@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Sun, 26 Jan 2014 11:54:02 +0000
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...hedpixels.co.uk>
Cc:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	jslaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] serial: samsung: Move uart_register_driver call to
	device probe

On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 12:45:05AM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Peter handed it on. Try using git log on Documentation/devices.txt. It
> still gets updates.
> 
> Perhaps you'd care to stick to reality and fix the tree instead of trying
> to excuse the mess ?

Perhaps returning to reality might be advantageous rather than trying
to repeat statements which can't have any bearing on this - especially
as the git history which you're referring to only goes back to 2.6.12-rc2,
and this predates 2.6.12-rc2 by a long shot.

> More importantly certain folks need to stop abusing static numbers
> allocated properly. Repeating it having made a total hash of it before
> is dismal.

And if you continue these stupid accusations which have no basis at all,
we're going to get into a real big argument, because you are soo _wrong_
on that point.  I was always the one arguing /against/ the re-use of
existing major/minor numbers.  I was the one arguing /against/ Nicolas'
patches to make every serial port appear in the 4,64 ttyS namespace.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up.  Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/