[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E61C20.50804@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 09:43:12 +0100
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] X86: remove redundant cpuidle_idle_call()
On 01/27/2014 07:08 AM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> The core idle loop now takes care of it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@...aro.org>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 5 +----
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> index 3fb8d95ab8..4505e2a950 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> @@ -298,10 +298,7 @@ void arch_cpu_idle_dead(void)
> */
> void arch_cpu_idle(void)
> {
> - if (cpuidle_idle_call())
> - x86_idle();
> - else
> - local_irq_enable();
For the record, it was pointless to enable the local irq here because it
is handled by the cpuidle framework when exiting the idle state.
> + x86_idle();
> }
>
> /*
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists