[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1390814053.5425.145.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:14:13 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, rostedt@...dmis.org,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] 3.12.8-rt11
On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 05:54 +0100, Carsten Emde wrote:
> It is well conceivable that this or one of the next 3.12.X-rtY
> versions will remind us of the legendary 2.6.33 RT kernel.
Hm. I wonder if HRTIMER_SOFTIRQ being processed alone, and at maxed out
priority wouldn't beat 2.6.33-rt on your boxen. My 64 core box running
-rt9 (minus nohz_full patches) does beat it.
Two hacks attached if you're curious too, one to optionally resurrect
sirq threads, another to kick obnoxious idle_balance().. below the belt.
-Mike
View attachment "softirq-resurrect-threads.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (11445 bytes)
View attachment "sched-further-limit-idle_balance.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (1588 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists