lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADDKRnDZPpUgbRN6tJeXBAC9=M+5HN57ArL9yYA237ELkKMvCg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 10:19:41 +0100
From:	Jörg Otte <jrg.otte@...il.com>
To:	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ACPI: reduce log level for message "ACPI: \_PR_.CPU4:
 failed to get CPU APIC ID"

2014-01-27 Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>:
> Commit b981513f806d (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse
> APIC ID for CPU) emits an error message if ACPI processor driver fails
> to query APIC ID for the CPU.
>
> Originally it's designed to catch BIOS bugs for CPU hot-addition. But
> it accidently reveals another type of BIOS bug that:
> 1) BIOS implements ACPI objects for all possible instead of present
>    CPUs. (It's legal per ACPI specification.)
> 2) BIOS doesn't implement _STA method for CPU objects. OSPM assumes
>    that all CPU objects are present and functioning and binds ACPI
>    processor driver to those CPU objects, which then triggers the error
>    message. According to ACPI spec, BIOS should implement _STA method
>    for those absent CPUs at least.
>
> Though it's a BIOS bug in essential, there are some BIOSes in the fields
> which are implmented in this way. So reduce the log level from ERR to
> DEBUG to accommodate these existing BIOSes.
>
> Fixes: b981513f806d (ACPI / scan: bail out early if failed to parse APIC ID for CPU)
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c |    2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> index c9311be..c29c2c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c
> @@ -261,7 +261,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_info(struct acpi_device *device)
>
>         apic_id = acpi_get_apicid(pr->handle, device_declaration, pr->acpi_id);
>         if (apic_id < 0) {
> -               acpi_handle_err(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
> +               acpi_handle_debug(pr->handle, "failed to get CPU APIC ID.\n");
>                 return -ENODEV;
>         }
>         pr->apic_id = apic_id;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>

Thanks, the patch works for me.

Jörg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ