linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACVxJT9aBNw6zbOdn+S98zSx6xZ5YkHXBtyJnf9VWYaf1o5GzA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:33:22 +0300
From:	Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To:	mingo@...nel.org
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, pali.rohar@...il.com,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] afs: proc cells and rootcell are writeable

Ingo wrote:
> Perhaps we could also generate the most common variants as:
>
>  #define PERM__rw_r__r__ 0644

You're not alone!
http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0607.3/1325.html

But I think 0644 is obvious and the most right way.

Of course, proc should detect those (->write vs ->mode) and complain.
Something I never sent.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/