linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement task_nice and task

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:08:50 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Dongsheng Yang <yangds.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, raistlin@...ux.it,
	juri.lelli@...il.com, clark.williams@...il.com, mingo@...hat.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] sched: Implement task_nice and task_prio as static
 inline functions.

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:59:40PM -0500, Dongsheng Yang wrote:
> >>>>+static inline int task_nice(const struct task_struct *p)
> >>>>+{
> >>>>+	return TASK_NICE(p);
> >>>>+}
> >>>Urgh, no. Just remove the macro already. Although arguably we should
> >>>remove ->static_prio and clean up that entire mess.
> >>>
> >>Oops, sorry for the noise. I am a newbie here, could you help to point out
> >>that
> >>  which tree is the latest version for sched. Thanx :)
> >tip/sched/core or tip/master, but that's not the issue. There's no point
> >in having an inline and a macro that do the exact same thing.
> 
> Okey, so, do you mean I should remove the macro of TASK_NICE and
> implement it directly in inline task_nice?  If so, I will send v2 soon.

Yah, although ideally someone would rethink the entire prio thing and
get rid of the back and forth.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/