linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: via-rhine: switch to generic DMA functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 15:28:43 +0000
From:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To:	Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: via-rhine: switch to generic DMA functions

On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:26 +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
> 2014/1/27 Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>:
> > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:51 +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
[...]
> >> @@ -1094,20 +1094,22 @@ static int alloc_ring(struct net_device* dev)
> >>       void *ring;
> >>       dma_addr_t ring_dma;
> >>
> >> -     ring = pci_alloc_consistent(rp->pdev,
> >> +     ring = dma_alloc_coherent(&rp->pdev->dev,
> >>                                   RX_RING_SIZE * sizeof(struct rx_desc) +
> >>                                   TX_RING_SIZE * sizeof(struct tx_desc),
> >> -                                 &ring_dma);
> >> +                                 &ring_dma,
> >> +                                     GFP_ATOMIC);
> > [...]
> >
> > Indentation is messed up here (and in several other function calls
> > you're changing).  You should align the function arguments so each line
> > begins in the column after the opening parenthesis.
> 
> Ben, thanks for pointing out. I actually just tried to follow the
> style of surrounding code, but happy to adjust if that's the preferred
> option. From what I can see, these lines should still fit in below 80
> cols even with increased indents...
> 
> Should we then also adjust other function calls within the driver with
> similar indentation (if any), that are currently not touched by this
> patch series?

There is no need to do that at the same time, but it would be a nice bit
of cleanup.

Ben.

-- 
Ben Hutchings
If at first you don't succeed, you're doing about average.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)