linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] aio: fix kiocb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 27 Jan 2014 12:36:08 -0500
From:	Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@...ck.org>
To:	Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>
Cc:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, kmo@...erainc.com,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aio@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, m.szyprowski@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] aio: fix kiocb_cancel() funcition

Hello Robert,

On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 09:45:01AM +0100, Robert Baldyga wrote:
> This patch solves problem related with lack of possibility to call
> aio_complete() from cancel callback. It was because it needs to lock
> ctx->ctx_lock which is always locked before kiocb_cancel() call. So there
> was no way to complete request properly.
> 
> Now spinlock is unlocked before cancel callback function call, so spinlock
> recursion will not occur in case of aio_complete() call. After cancel function
> call spinlock is locked back.

You can't just do that -- it introduces a possible use-after-free issue with 
the kiocb when cancellation occurs.  Like I said in my previous email: you 
have to deal with object lifetime expecatations in order to do that.  If you 
could post the code that you're trying to fix this bug for, there might be 
other solutions to the problem we can suggest.

		-ben

> There is also __must_hold() macro added for kiocb_cancel() function, to allow
> sparse spin lock checking.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>

Nack.  Do not apply.

> ---
> 
> This patch was created according to suggestions of Benjamin LaHaise
> (https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/1/23/336).
> 
>  fs/aio.c |   12 +++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/aio.c b/fs/aio.c
> index 062a5f6..6d5cd9e 100644
> --- a/fs/aio.c
> +++ b/fs/aio.c
> @@ -472,8 +472,10 @@ void kiocb_set_cancel_fn(struct kiocb *req, kiocb_cancel_fn *cancel)
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(kiocb_set_cancel_fn);
>  
>  static int kiocb_cancel(struct kioctx *ctx, struct kiocb *kiocb)
> +			__must_hold(&ctx->ctx_lock)
>  {
>  	kiocb_cancel_fn *old, *cancel;
> +	int ret;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't want to set kiocb->ki_cancel = KIOCB_CANCELLED unless it
> @@ -489,7 +491,15 @@ static int kiocb_cancel(struct kioctx *ctx, struct kiocb *kiocb)
>  		cancel = cmpxchg(&kiocb->ki_cancel, old, KIOCB_CANCELLED);
>  	} while (cancel != old);
>  
> -	return cancel(kiocb);
> +	/*
> +	 * cancel() function may call aio_complete function, which needs to
> +	 * lock ctx->ctx_lock, so we call cancel() with spinlock unlocked
> +	 */
> +	spin_unlock(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> +	ret = cancel(kiocb);
> +	spin_lock(&ctx->ctx_lock);
> +
> +	return ret;
>  }
>  
>  static void free_ioctx(struct work_struct *work)
> -- 
> 1.7.9.5

-- 
"Thought is the essence of where you are now."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/