[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E5DDA5.2010705@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2014 20:16:37 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
LM Sensors <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>
Subject: Re: [lm-sensors] lm90 driver no longer working on PCs in 3.13
On 01/26/2014 03:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 02:04:06PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>
>> I think I have a better idea: Surround the regulator code, or at least
>> its error handling, in the lm90 driver with
>
>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF)) {
>> }
>
>> Would that be ok ? If yes I'll submit a patch. I'll do the same in
>> another driver I am working on.
>
> That's not going to have the desired effect in cases where DT is built
> into the kernel but not in use on the current system (which is a
> configuration that gets used) and will remove error handling for non-DT
> systems that do have regulators set up. There's not the relationship
> between this and DT that you seem think there is...
>
> Besides, if we're going to do a bodge like that we should do it in the
> core and not in individual callers.
>
Then it appears the only remedy at this time is to revert the patch.
Guenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists