[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E6E4AE.4040906@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 27 Jan 2014 23:58:54 +0100
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: gxt@...c.pku.edu.cn, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
vapier@...too.org, totglx@...utronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] __init setup_early_printk: missing initialization
On 27.01.2014 22:49, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 19:10:24 +0100 xypron.glpk@....de wrote:
>
>> From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@....de>
>>
>> If is based on uninitialized value keep_early.
>> This leads to unpredictable result.
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/early_printk.c
>> +++ b/arch/unicore32/kernel/early_printk.c
>> @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static struct console early_ocd_console = {
>>
>> static int __init setup_early_printk(char *buf)
>> {
>> - int keep_early;
>> + int keep_early = 0;
>>
>> if (!buf || early_console)
>> return 0;
>
> yup.
>
> But that code is quite overcooked. How about this?
>
> --- a/arch/unicore32/kernel/early_printk.c~arch-unicore32-kernel-early_printkc-setup_early_printk-missing-initialization-fix
> +++ a/arch/unicore32/kernel/early_printk.c
> @@ -35,17 +35,11 @@ static struct console early_ocd_console
>
> static int __init setup_early_printk(char *buf)
> {
> - int keep_early = 0;
> -
> if (!buf || early_console)
> return 0;
>
> - if (strstr(buf, "keep"))
> - keep_early = 1;
> -
> early_console = &early_ocd_console;
> -
> - if (keep_early)
> + if (strstr(buf, "keep"))
> early_console->flags &= ~CON_BOOT;
> else
> early_console->flags |= CON_BOOT;
> _
>
>
Your code is easier to read, and has same functionality.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists