[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140128111756.GE15937@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:17:57 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andy Gross <agross@...eaurora.org>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 2/2] dmaengine: qcom_bam_dma: Add device tree binding
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:16:53AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 28 January 2014 10:05:35 Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> > Why does the direction needs to be specified in specifier? I see two
> > options, either the direction per is fixed in hardware. In that case the DMA
> > controller node should describe which channel is which direction. Or the
> > direction is not fixed in hardware and can be changed at runtime in which
> > case it should be set on a per descriptor basis.
>
> Normally the direction is implied by dmaengine_slave_config().
No. The direction argument in there is deprecated - we've been talking
about removing it for some time.
DMA engine drivers should store all parameters of the configuration, and
then select the appropriate ones when preparing a transfer (which itself
involves a direction.)
Not doing this implies that if you have a half-duplex device, you have to
repeatedly issue a dmaengine_slave_config() call, a prepare call, and a
submit call to the DMA engine code for every segment you want to transfer.
We don't need that kind of DMA engine specific behaviour in DMA engine
users.
--
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: 5.8Mbps down 500kbps up. Estimation
in database were 13.1 to 19Mbit for a good line, about 7.5+ for a bad.
Estimate before purchase was "up to 13.2Mbit".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists