linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140128121236.GC3998@ghostprotocols.net>
Date:	Tue, 28 Jan 2014 09:12:36 -0300
From:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>
Cc:	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
	jason.low2@...com, Waiman.Long@...com, scott.norton@...com,
	aswin@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf-bench: introduce futex microbenchmarks

Em Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 08:12:42PM -0800, Davidlohr Bueso escreveu:
> On Fri, 2014-01-24 at 10:13 -0800, Darren Hart wrote:
> > I agree that we should take whatever makes sense for perf out of
> > futex-test and merge it with perf. It will see greater use and receive
> > more review and improvements than it will in my obscure repository.

> > With trinity covering the fuzz testing and perf handling performance
> > tests, I think futex-test can be reduced down to a functional
> > test-suite, which is perfectly fine with me.

> > If there is still interest here, I'll support it.

> Arnaldo, could you consider this for 3.15? I've also got some additional
> work for perf-bench but am waiting for this to get settled first.

Sure, I'll try applying it later today.

- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/