[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E7C06F.3010205@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 14:36:31 +0000
From: Julien Grall <julien.grall@...aro.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
ian.campbell@...rix.com, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen/events: xen_evtchn_fifo_init can be called very late
On 01/28/2014 02:30 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, David Vrabel wrote:
>> On 28/01/14 00:34, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> On ARM, xen_init_IRQ (which calls xen_evtchn_fifo_init) is called after
>>> all CPUs are online. It would mean that the notifier will never be called.
>>
>> Why does ARM call xen_init_IRQ() so late? Is it possible to call it
>> earlier when only the boot CPU is online? There are problems with
>> attempting to init FIFO event channels after all CPUs are online.
>>
>> If evtchn_fifo_init_control_block(cpu) fails on anything other than the
>> first CPU, that CPU will be unable to receive any events. Xen will have
>> been switched to FIFO mode and it is not possible to revert back to
>> 2-level mode.
>
> We simply didn't need to be called that early.
> Most of xen_guest_init could be moved to an early_initcall, if that is
> necessary.
>
I'm actually working on a patch to move xen_init_IRQ() in early_initcall.
--
Julien Grall
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists