[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52E7D918.5020704@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:21:44 -0500
From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
<linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>, <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
<linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
<x86@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>, <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 00/73] tree-wide: clean up some no longer required
#include <linux/init.h>
On 14-01-27 10:13 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-22 at 19:38 -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> Thanks, it was a great help as it uncovered a few issues in fringe arch
>> that I didn't have toolchains for, and I've fixed all of those up.
>>
>> I've noticed that powerpc has been un-buildable for a while now; I have
>> used this hack patch locally so I could run the ppc defconfigs to check
>> that I didn't break anything. Maybe useful for linux-next in the
>> interim? It is a hack patch -- Not-Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker. :)
>
> Can you and/or Aneesh submit that as a proper patch (with S-O-B
> etc...) ?
I'd updated toolchains and didn't realize it was still broken. Patch sent.
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/314749/
Paul.
--
>
> Thanks !
>
> Cheers,
> Ben.
>
>> Paul.
>> --
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> index d27960c89a71..d0f070a2b395 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pgtable-ppc64.h
>> @@ -560,9 +560,9 @@ extern void pmdp_invalidate(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
>> pmd_t *pmdp);
>>
>> #define pmd_move_must_withdraw pmd_move_must_withdraw
>> -typedef struct spinlock spinlock_t;
>> -static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(spinlock_t *new_pmd_ptl,
>> - spinlock_t *old_pmd_ptl)
>> +struct spinlock;
>> +static inline int pmd_move_must_withdraw(struct spinlock *new_pmd_ptl,
>> + struct spinlock *old_pmd_ptl)
>> {
>> /*
>> * Archs like ppc64 use pgtable to store per pmd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists