[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140128164937.GA30226@saruman.home>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:49:37 -0600
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: "xinhui.pan" <xinhuix.pan@...el.com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
<david.a.cohen@...ux.intel.com>, <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
<gnurou@...il.com>, <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio-intel-mid: fix the incorrect return of idle callback
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 04:50:57PM +0800, xinhui.pan wrote:
> From: "xinhui.pan" <xinhuiX.pan@...el.com>
>
> intel_gpio_runtime_idle should return correct error code if it do fail.
> make it more correct even though -EBUSY is the most possible return value.
>
> Signed-off-by: bo.he <bo.he@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: xinhui.pan <xinhuiX.pan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> index d1b50ef..05749a3 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-intel-mid.c
> @@ -394,7 +394,9 @@ static const struct irq_domain_ops intel_gpio_irq_ops = {
>
> static int intel_gpio_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
> {
> - pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> + int err = pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
> + if (err)
> + return err;
> return -EBUSY;
wait, is it only me or this would look a lot better as:
static int intel_gpio_runtime_idle(struct device *dev)
{
return pm_schedule_suspend(dev, 500);
}
cheers
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists