[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABjd4Yx5HtbGjo_ZsOJ5SvqFQZey1fv5K36PD=D9fUUn0SanVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 22:31:20 +0400
From: Alexey Charkov <alchark@...il.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Prisk <linux@...sktech.co.nz>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Roger Luethi <rl@...lgate.ch>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] net: via-rhine: add OF bus binding
2014/1/28 Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>:
> On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 19:34 +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>> 2014/1/27 Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>:
>> > On Mon, 2014-01-27 at 15:51 +0400, Alexey Charkov wrote:
>> >> This should make the driver usable with VIA/WonderMedia ARM-based
>> >> Systems-on-Chip integrated Rhine III adapters. Note that these
>> >> are always in MMIO mode, and don't have any known EEPROM.
>> > [...]
>> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/via/Kconfig
>> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/via/Kconfig
>> >> @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ if NET_VENDOR_VIA
>> >>
>> >> config VIA_RHINE
>> >> tristate "VIA Rhine support"
>> >> - depends on PCI
>> >> + depends on (PCI || USE_OF)
>> >> select CRC32
>> >> select MII
>> >> ---help---
>> >
>> > This seems like the right thing to do, but it means you need to add
>> > #ifdef CONFIG_PCI and #ifdef CONFIG_USE_OF around the driver structures
>> > and related functions.
>>
>> Frankly, I would like to avoid that if possible (as pointed out in the
>> cover email), as I believe we would get a cleaner driver without
>> #ifdef. This is also the way it was done in via-velocity, and it works
>> just fine.
>
> OK, I'm surprised that all the PCI functions have dummy definitions.
>
>> > You should compile-test in configurations that have just one of those
>> > dependencies enabled.
>>
>> This has been compile-tested and runtime-tested in OF-only
>> configuration on WM8950, and Roger also tested it in PCI-only
>> configuration, so it seems to work fine.
> [...]
>
> Good, then I have no objection.
Thanks Ben! Would it be fine to add your Reviewed-by at the next
iteration, once I fix indentation of function arguments and
dev_is_pci()?
Thanks,
Alexey
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists