[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-aff7385b5a16bca6b8d9243f01a9ea5a5b411e1d@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:22:44 -0800
From: tip-bot for Waiman Long <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, peterz@...radead.org,
tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, jason.low2@...com,
paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Waiman.Long@...com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, walken@...gle.com
Subject: [tip:core/locking] locking/mutexes/mcs: Correct barrier usage
Commit-ID: aff7385b5a16bca6b8d9243f01a9ea5a5b411e1d
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/aff7385b5a16bca6b8d9243f01a9ea5a5b411e1d
Author: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 15:35:53 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 13:13:26 +0100
locking/mutexes/mcs: Correct barrier usage
This patch corrects the way memory barriers are used in the MCS lock
with smp_load_acquire and smp_store_release fucnctions. The previous
barriers could leak critical sections if mcs lock is used by itself.
It is not a problem when mcs lock is embedded in mutex but will be an
issue when the mcs_lock is used elsewhere.
The patch removes the incorrect barriers and put in correct
barriers with the pair of functions smp_load_acquire and smp_store_release.
Suggested-by: Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@...com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1390347353.3138.62.camel@schen9-DESK
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
kernel/locking/mutex.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index 4dd6e4c..fbbd2ed 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -136,9 +136,12 @@ void mspin_lock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node)
return;
}
ACCESS_ONCE(prev->next) = node;
- smp_wmb();
- /* Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down */
- while (!ACCESS_ONCE(node->locked))
+ /*
+ * Wait until the lock holder passes the lock down.
+ * Using smp_load_acquire() provides a memory barrier that
+ * ensures subsequent operations happen after the lock is acquired.
+ */
+ while (!(smp_load_acquire(&node->locked)))
arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
}
@@ -156,8 +159,13 @@ static void mspin_unlock(struct mspin_node **lock, struct mspin_node *node)
while (!(next = ACCESS_ONCE(node->next)))
arch_mutex_cpu_relax();
}
- ACCESS_ONCE(next->locked) = 1;
- smp_wmb();
+ /*
+ * Pass lock to next waiter.
+ * smp_store_release() provides a memory barrier to ensure
+ * all operations in the critical section has been completed
+ * before unlocking.
+ */
+ smp_store_release(&next->locked, 1);
}
/*
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists