[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFx8QkcWdq7hqi+nypZ5ePFBHO5NhBsnTG+AgJLhWodVYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:17:37 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] memblock, nobootmem: Add memblock_virt_alloc_low()
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Hence, having ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT set to 4GB-1 by default seems to be
> completely rediculous - and presumably this also fails on x86_32 if it
> returns memory up at 4GB.
Agreed. That looks broken even on x86-32. The low address limit is not
even *close* to 4GB in general on 32-bit, since you not only have the
TASK_SIZE, you have the kmap and the vmalloc area. On x86-32,
ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT should be MAXMEM, which iirc is somewhere
around 890MB or so. Not 4G.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists